Unwavering respect: Commemoration of the Russian-Ukrainian war through the eyes of Sumy citizens

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the study of the commemoration of the Russian-Ukrainian war as a tool for uniting the Ukrainian people, strengthening national identity, and preserving the Ukrainian nation in the context of a full-scale war. Based on the analysis of scientific theories regarding collective memory, it is shown that commemoration is a mobile, multifaceted social system that ensures the connection between generations, weaving past experience into present life. Its main function is to transform shared trauma – the pain, losses, and suffering inflicted by the war – into a strong foundation for future historical memory and national resilience. This transformation of grief into strength is crucial for the stability and recovery of the Ukrainian nation following the current war.

It is proven that the commemoration of the events and heroes of the Russian-Ukrainian war is an important factor of national identity, which ensures the unity of generations around honoring the memory of those who secured the future of the nation at the cost of their own lives.

Particular attention is paid to the commemoration processes in the border city of Sumy, which has survived occupation, constant shelling, and heroic defense, becoming an example of how memorial practices become an integral part of the daily struggle and resistance.

The results of a sociological survey of Sumy residents are presented regarding their attitude toward commemorating the events and heroes of the war, its forms, and the necessity of conducting it now, during the hostilities. The study sought to determine how Sumy residents feel about memorial initiatives, whether they participate in commemoration, and how strongly they associate themselves with the national history that is currently being written.

An interesting paradox was empirically revealed: people highly value and emotionally need commemoration (the majority consider it necessary), but they have a low awareness of the concept of commemoration. This shows that commemoration occurs at the level of feelings and intuition, preceding scientific justification.

It is concluded that for Sumy residents, commemoration provides a sense of independence and indomitability, confirming their right to their own history. At the same time, for many city residents, it is emotionally difficult, capable of evoking painful memories of the events they have experienced. This requires special attention from the authorities and cultural institutions to the psychological barrier, introducing supportive therapeutic forms of commemoration that would not only recall losses but also emphasize the nation's fortitude, resilience, and unity.

Would you like me to focus on translating a specific part of this text, or perhaps find scholarly resources related to the sociology of memory and war commemoration?

The obtained results can serve as a basis for the development of local cultural and psychological rehabilitation programs related to war memory.