The Historical Influence of Kharkiv’s Capital Period (1919–1934) on the Evolution of Its Architectural Identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15466710Keywords:
Ukraine, Kharkiv, capital, Ukrainian SSR, architecture, constructivism, construction, 1919–1934Abstract
This article explores the historical impact of Kharkiv’s status as the capital of the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic (USSR) from 1919 to 1934 on the formation and evolution of the city's architectural identity. It analyzes the political and socio-economic factors that led to Kharkiv's designation as the capital and their direct influence on the launch of large-scale urban development. Particular emphasis is placed on the rise of avant-garde modernism—specifically Constructivism—which emerged as the dominant architectural style during this period.
The paper examines the causes and consequences of changes in the city's political and administrative status and outlines the main characteristics of the architecture of this new era. It presents examples of landmark buildings from the historical period in question. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic, the article draws upon a wide range of historical materials, including statistical data, archival sources, and academic research.
The study reviews key architectural ensembles and individual buildings constructed in Kharkiv during this time, highlighting their role in shaping the city’s unique architectural code. It emphasizes that, beyond the well-known structures, the city also contains a significant number of lesser-known buildings from the 1920s–1930s designed in the Constructivist style. The article argues that Kharkiv’s capital status was a defining factor in the city’s architectural transformation during the interwar period. The widespread construction of Constructivist buildings during this time had a profound impact on Kharkiv’s urban appearance, significantly contributing to the formation of its historical and architectural identity.
The capital period stimulated the development of administrative, residential, cultural, and industrial infrastructure. As a result, Kharkiv became one of the most prominent centers of architectural avant-garde in Ukraine. The article stresses the importance of preserving and further researching the city’s unique architectural heritage of the 1920s and 1930s.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Дмитро Володимирович Новгородов

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.