Metaphysics of Invincibility: The Philosophical Dimension of Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20118635Keywords:
Stoicism, extreme situation, courage to be, transcendence, subjectivity, lifeworld, existential intelligence, antifragility, state of exception, vitality.Abstract
The article is devoted to the conceptualization of the phenomenon of “unbreakability” as a fundamental metaphysical construct that goes beyond the classical understanding of resilience. The purpose of the study is to carry out a philosophical demarcation between the mechanisms of adaptive resilience and the ontological stability of the subject in the extreme conditions of war. The authors seek to trace the intellectual genesis of the idea of unbreakability from the ancient tradition to modern existential and systems theories, substantiating the specificity of the Ukrainian experience of resistance as an act of radical self-reinvention.
The methodological basis of the study is a complex of general philosophical methods. Comparative analysis is applied to distinguish between the concepts of “resilience,” “vitality,” and “unbreakability.” The historical-philosophical method allowed for the reconstruction of the evolution of the idea of the “inner fortress” from Stoicism to the “philosophy of will” (A. Schopenhauer, F. Nietzsche) and existentialism (K. Jaspers, P. Tillich). A phenomenological approach is used to describe unbreakability as the defense of the integrity of the “lifeworld” (Lebenswelt), while the hermeneutic method enabled the interpretation of I. Kozlovsky’s concept of “existential intelligence.” The systems approach and N. Taleb’s theory are involved to substantiate “antifragility” as a model for the development of socio-cultural systems through chaos.
The study demonstrates that unbreakability is not a static trait but a dynamic ontological act. It was established that, unlike resilience, which aims to return to the previous state, unbreakability requires the transformation of the subject. The contributions of contemporary Ukrainian thinkers were analyzed: T. Lyutyi (unbreakability as transcendence), V. Kebuladze (horizon of solidarity), and V. Yermolenko (resistance to simplification). Particular attention is given to I. Kozlovsky’s concept of existential intelligence as an operational mechanism that allows conscious manipulation of meanings at the point of extreme uncertainty. It is proven that integrating N. Taleb’s concept of “antifragility” allows interpreting Ukrainian resistance as the nation’s capacity for an evolutionary leap triggered by confrontation with catastrophe. At the same time, incorporating G. Agamben’s ideas about the “state of exception” made it possible to formulate a critical caveat: true unbreakability requires preserving internal freedom and legal space inside the “fortress” itself.
The analysis enables the assertion that Ukrainian unbreakability manifests itself as an ontological constant of the spirit. It represents a unique global path of overcoming crisis through active self-reinvention of the subject, where the will to meaning becomes the guarantee of victory of the human dimension over the insignificance of aggression. It is determined that unbreakability is a complex synthesis of the inner verticality of the individual and the outer horizontality of social solidarity. The conclusion is made that coordinating the efforts of state institutions is a necessary condition for institutionalizing this culture of unbreakability, which serves as a foundation for survival, successful adaptation, and further rebuilding of Ukraine both in the ongoing confrontation and in the post-war period.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Антоніна Іванівна Яручик, Ігор Миколайович Гоян

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.